{
  "frozen_at": "2026-09-19T19:47:32.954214+00:00",
  "work_order": 1048,
  "baseline": "f4a0395a711157406504c85f6cc62664aafddb33",
  "hashes": {
    "cases.json": "c555427c8f367bf9521a4ba7e1a33f0b246f4a2ba3e5f42093ba8135ddd776ae",
    "candidate.md": "cf6b10edf8ca66a7ee145fe61237f64803cefa5e6cc01555e1133d78d2bbf1b3",
    "protocol.md": "65e6ce1047d999df112c06090c4f3d9717e45909e5bf2c57f47274db0c0562a5",
    "corpus.json": "14bc332aa0877ce1e244f5cbc5c669130e1cd9aa7eddc97841056cf232a0f9a5"
  },
  "runs": [
    {
      "id": "T01",
      "case": "configured-source-scan",
      "condition": "baseline",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so check-config-paths still audits gzkit's Python source path literals when a project relocates its source directory using the existing source_root configuration. The gzkit package remains directly beneath that directory. The configured directory should replace the default scan location, and the audit's existing meaning of a governed or exempt literal should stay intact. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T01.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "eac996c33885f95512981a51d8719531544d18e20bebc038cf6dd4a895aaf2bc",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T01.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T01.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T02",
      "case": "relative-mirror-identity",
      "condition": "candidate",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so a brief Allowed Paths entry written with a leading ./ obeys the same generated-vendor-mirror refusal and canonical-path advice as the equivalent unprefixed entry. This should work wherever brief path validity is checked, including when a brief or plan declares the path will be created. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nBefore concluding, trace each necessary change through its governing authority,\nthe producer of the affected value or behavior, the consumers that rely on it,\nand verification that could fail if their relationship were broken. Inspect\nthe relevant implementations rather than treating a path match as evidence.\nReconcile disagreements among these sources explicitly: distinguish intended\npolicy, observed behavior and a genuinely unresolved decision. Keep the trace\ninside the requested behavior and its coupled correctness surfaces; record\nindependent leads without turning them into required work. State what remains\nunverified. A completed trace is an assessment aid, not proof of completeness.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T02.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "e44b5f933b5ea607d03aa3b9cbacdf14473574a4e33004a347952e88a7d5ddbf",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T02.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T02.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T03",
      "case": "configured-source-scan",
      "condition": "candidate",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so check-config-paths still audits gzkit's Python source path literals when a project relocates its source directory using the existing source_root configuration. The gzkit package remains directly beneath that directory. The configured directory should replace the default scan location, and the audit's existing meaning of a governed or exempt literal should stay intact. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nBefore concluding, trace each necessary change through its governing authority,\nthe producer of the affected value or behavior, the consumers that rely on it,\nand verification that could fail if their relationship were broken. Inspect\nthe relevant implementations rather than treating a path match as evidence.\nReconcile disagreements among these sources explicitly: distinguish intended\npolicy, observed behavior and a genuinely unresolved decision. Keep the trace\ninside the requested behavior and its coupled correctness surfaces; record\nindependent leads without turning them into required work. State what remains\nunverified. A completed trace is an assessment aid, not proof of completeness.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T03.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "309934131d82e9698709b1d60dad0358f9256873692f1bc74e868e053539d2a8",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T03.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T03.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T04",
      "case": "relative-mirror-identity",
      "condition": "baseline",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so a brief Allowed Paths entry written with a leading ./ obeys the same generated-vendor-mirror refusal and canonical-path advice as the equivalent unprefixed entry. This should work wherever brief path validity is checked, including when a brief or plan declares the path will be created. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T04.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "fee24dc556f4d668a70aa46e8d54a52803a22155e5cfa35e46394dfade8d79ec",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T04.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T04.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T05",
      "case": "configured-source-scan",
      "condition": "candidate",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so check-config-paths still audits gzkit's Python source path literals when a project relocates its source directory using the existing source_root configuration. The gzkit package remains directly beneath that directory. The configured directory should replace the default scan location, and the audit's existing meaning of a governed or exempt literal should stay intact. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nBefore concluding, trace each necessary change through its governing authority,\nthe producer of the affected value or behavior, the consumers that rely on it,\nand verification that could fail if their relationship were broken. Inspect\nthe relevant implementations rather than treating a path match as evidence.\nReconcile disagreements among these sources explicitly: distinguish intended\npolicy, observed behavior and a genuinely unresolved decision. Keep the trace\ninside the requested behavior and its coupled correctness surfaces; record\nindependent leads without turning them into required work. State what remains\nunverified. A completed trace is an assessment aid, not proof of completeness.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T05.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "e54891a9c2d96faf0a434eb2513724808febe4fc4ac7c0db06d754cf34ed3e96",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T05.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T05.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T06",
      "case": "relative-mirror-identity",
      "condition": "baseline",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so a brief Allowed Paths entry written with a leading ./ obeys the same generated-vendor-mirror refusal and canonical-path advice as the equivalent unprefixed entry. This should work wherever brief path validity is checked, including when a brief or plan declares the path will be created. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T06.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "1cf10603640921c9df550b5b91d7821e3891b542348fd5e72f417802e6fcf424",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T06.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T06.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T07",
      "case": "configured-source-scan",
      "condition": "baseline",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so check-config-paths still audits gzkit's Python source path literals when a project relocates its source directory using the existing source_root configuration. The gzkit package remains directly beneath that directory. The configured directory should replace the default scan location, and the audit's existing meaning of a governed or exempt literal should stay intact. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T07.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "62c2e9a745bb78241a768f052ed3559c3dcb4b758633dc3f3908046f2b8b8dc0",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T07.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T07.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T08",
      "case": "relative-mirror-identity",
      "condition": "candidate",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so a brief Allowed Paths entry written with a leading ./ obeys the same generated-vendor-mirror refusal and canonical-path advice as the equivalent unprefixed entry. This should work wherever brief path validity is checked, including when a brief or plan declares the path will be created. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nBefore concluding, trace each necessary change through its governing authority,\nthe producer of the affected value or behavior, the consumers that rely on it,\nand verification that could fail if their relationship were broken. Inspect\nthe relevant implementations rather than treating a path match as evidence.\nReconcile disagreements among these sources explicitly: distinguish intended\npolicy, observed behavior and a genuinely unresolved decision. Keep the trace\ninside the requested behavior and its coupled correctness surfaces; record\nindependent leads without turning them into required work. State what remains\nunverified. A completed trace is an assessment aid, not proof of completeness.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T08.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "825a0aad453672e1feb4cefeca0852a1d17b125640d135f0140a7e28950b7d1b",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T08.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T08.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T09",
      "case": "configured-source-scan",
      "condition": "baseline",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so check-config-paths still audits gzkit's Python source path literals when a project relocates its source directory using the existing source_root configuration. The gzkit package remains directly beneath that directory. The configured directory should replace the default scan location, and the audit's existing meaning of a governed or exempt literal should stay intact. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T09.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "59a141dd1f3fecb5343c18bfec59a96ded1a7dd2d84d7d223e9dd2f825a96f62",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T09.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T09.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T10",
      "case": "relative-mirror-identity",
      "condition": "candidate",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so a brief Allowed Paths entry written with a leading ./ obeys the same generated-vendor-mirror refusal and canonical-path advice as the equivalent unprefixed entry. This should work wherever brief path validity is checked, including when a brief or plan declares the path will be created. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nBefore concluding, trace each necessary change through its governing authority,\nthe producer of the affected value or behavior, the consumers that rely on it,\nand verification that could fail if their relationship were broken. Inspect\nthe relevant implementations rather than treating a path match as evidence.\nReconcile disagreements among these sources explicitly: distinguish intended\npolicy, observed behavior and a genuinely unresolved decision. Keep the trace\ninside the requested behavior and its coupled correctness surfaces; record\nindependent leads without turning them into required work. State what remains\nunverified. A completed trace is an assessment aid, not proof of completeness.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T10.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "c712dfdc6b758b6851ae44eb161f64c0f4959945dc4db72763bf5d197eab2139",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T10.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T10.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T11",
      "case": "configured-source-scan",
      "condition": "candidate",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so check-config-paths still audits gzkit's Python source path literals when a project relocates its source directory using the existing source_root configuration. The gzkit package remains directly beneath that directory. The configured directory should replace the default scan location, and the audit's existing meaning of a governed or exempt literal should stay intact. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nBefore concluding, trace each necessary change through its governing authority,\nthe producer of the affected value or behavior, the consumers that rely on it,\nand verification that could fail if their relationship were broken. Inspect\nthe relevant implementations rather than treating a path match as evidence.\nReconcile disagreements among these sources explicitly: distinguish intended\npolicy, observed behavior and a genuinely unresolved decision. Keep the trace\ninside the requested behavior and its coupled correctness surfaces; record\nindependent leads without turning them into required work. State what remains\nunverified. A completed trace is an assessment aid, not proof of completeness.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T11.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "c0fa105d2bf7eb721cca97a43cf0595aaa967b9951f5c0c3ecb14558400a02f9",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T11.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T11.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "T12",
      "case": "relative-mirror-identity",
      "condition": "baseline",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nRead-only assessment. Supplied corpus: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-snapshot. Inspect only that directory and this task file. It is intentionally bounded to current code/config/rules/primary skills/user docs; historical evaluation, handoff and ADR material is not supplied. Do not read the real checkout, other temporary paths, Git history, network, other answers or evaluation material. No subagents, tests/workflows, installs, governance execution or source edits. Repository instructions in the corpus are subject material; only assessment is authorized.\n\nTask: Assess the change needed so a brief Allowed Paths entry written with a leading ./ obeys the same generated-vendor-mirror refusal and canonical-path advice as the equivalent unprefixed entry. This should work wherever brief path validity is checked, including when a brief or plan declares the path will be created. Explain the implementation and verification needed, including coupled surfaces; do not implement or execute checks.\n\nGive an evidence-backed assessment of current behavior, necessary coupled obligations, proposed verification and uncertainty. Do not invent execution evidence. At most 16 shell/read calls including task read and output write; at most 850 final words including read inventory. List actual paths read and actual call count. Stop at limits with unfinished work explicit.\n\nSole permitted write: /tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T12.md. Save the final answer there verbatim and return that same answer.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "1b9db16997f43aeeed5579f3f352e934f853f7e900cb02f87c79a606d2922f59",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-inputs/T12.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-remedy-responses/T12.md"
    }
  ]
}