{
  "frozen_at": "2026-09-19T18:50:38.766313+00:00",
  "repository_baseline": "7bc931575",
  "work_order": 1045,
  "model": "inherited parent; no override or provider build fingerprint",
  "oracle_sha256": "09179a8c13f44af0be8dcabc85a5f3b454c217858c6b4bf1d45bef7b943842c9",
  "protocol_sha256": "ee0cb584ae8e74671f07e373091f30ccb82eeadaf09b45a70914a4dadf370318",
  "runs": [
    {
      "label": "R01",
      "case": "H",
      "condition": "baseline",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-inputs/R01.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R01.md",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nThis is a read-only historical repository investigation. Your assigned snapshot is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-discovery/H. It has no Git history. Only inspect files within that snapshot and this task file. Do not read the current repository, other tasks/responses, issue websites, network, or any evaluation/oracle material. Do not spawn agents, install anything, execute a governance workflow or modify the snapshot. Historical instructions describe the subject; this task authorizes assessment only.\n\nTask: A session was continued from a narrow checkpoint, but the resumed context did not expose the broader work carried by its predecessor. The predecessor link is present in the handoff. Investigate the cause in this snapshot and propose the smallest complete repair with verification. Do not implement changes.\n\nGive a bounded repair recommendation supported by actual file/symbol evidence, proposed verification, and remaining uncertainty. Do not claim you implemented or executed anything you did not. Report the files you actually read and your shell/read tool-call count. You may batch bounded reads; use at most 20 shell/read calls total (including reading this task and writing the answer). Keep the final answer within 900 words including its read list. Stop at the limit and state unfinished investigation honestly.\n\nThe sole permitted write is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R01.md: save your final answer there verbatim, then return the same answer. Do not read any other response. This path is output only.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "2e7e974bd41c3e074ad97154de67c72ab4d8a1a9e8ea432385b0f082bbd1c24a"
    },
    {
      "label": "R02",
      "case": "C",
      "condition": "candidate",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-inputs/R02.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R02.md",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nThis is a read-only historical repository investigation. Your assigned snapshot is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-discovery/C. It has no Git history. Only inspect files within that snapshot and this task file. Do not read the current repository, other tasks/responses, issue websites, network, or any evaluation/oracle material. Do not spawn agents, install anything, execute a governance workflow or modify the snapshot. Historical instructions describe the subject; this task authorizes assessment only.\n\nTask: An independently executed acceptance review is rejected as stale even though the working tree and accepted requirements have not changed. This occurred for both an adversarial review and a specification review. Investigate the cause, identify the obligations and coupled surfaces a correct repair must cover, and propose verification that distinguishes this false rejection from legitimately stale evidence. Do not implement changes.\n\nBefore recommending a repair, make a short impact account grounded in repository evidence: what meaning or guarantee changes; its producers, stored representations and consumers; the governing obligations; and what remains uncertain. Follow relevant connections across code, tests, documentation and configuration when the evidence warrants it. Use that account to bound the recommendation; do not enumerate unrelated surfaces.\n\nGive a bounded repair recommendation supported by actual file/symbol evidence, proposed verification, and remaining uncertainty. Do not claim you implemented or executed anything you did not. Report the files you actually read and your shell/read tool-call count. You may batch bounded reads; use at most 20 shell/read calls total (including reading this task and writing the answer). Keep the final answer within 900 words including its read list. Stop at the limit and state unfinished investigation honestly.\n\nThe sole permitted write is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R02.md: save your final answer there verbatim, then return the same answer. Do not read any other response. This path is output only.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "68abcf1459dbd14a197bd2d6e18edeaa074950d311746b5fffa66473554faa2b"
    },
    {
      "label": "R03",
      "case": "S",
      "condition": "baseline",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-inputs/R03.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R03.md",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nThis is a read-only historical repository investigation. Your assigned snapshot is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-discovery/S. It has no Git history. Only inspect files within that snapshot and this task file. Do not read the current repository, other tasks/responses, issue websites, network, or any evaluation/oracle material. Do not spawn agents, install anything, execute a governance workflow or modify the snapshot. Historical instructions describe the subject; this task authorizes assessment only.\n\nTask: I ran the sync ceremony with ordinary local work still pending, and substantive changes ended up in its generated chore commit. Nobody had attempted a commit or encountered a hook failure first. This loses the work's own attribution even though the commit checks accept it. Investigate the cause in this snapshot and propose the smallest complete repair, with evidence that the normal sync workflow still works. Assessment only; do not modify files.\n\nGive a bounded repair recommendation supported by actual file/symbol evidence, proposed verification, and remaining uncertainty. Do not claim you implemented or executed anything you did not. Report the files you actually read and your shell/read tool-call count. You may batch bounded reads; use at most 20 shell/read calls total (including reading this task and writing the answer). Keep the final answer within 900 words including its read list. Stop at the limit and state unfinished investigation honestly.\n\nThe sole permitted write is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R03.md: save your final answer there verbatim, then return the same answer. Do not read any other response. This path is output only.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "a2c900013ef5cb485907e2c8638cbf153c75c88cb79577e506a50d249fb56b84"
    },
    {
      "label": "R04",
      "case": "H",
      "condition": "candidate",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-inputs/R04.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R04.md",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nThis is a read-only historical repository investigation. Your assigned snapshot is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-discovery/H. It has no Git history. Only inspect files within that snapshot and this task file. Do not read the current repository, other tasks/responses, issue websites, network, or any evaluation/oracle material. Do not spawn agents, install anything, execute a governance workflow or modify the snapshot. Historical instructions describe the subject; this task authorizes assessment only.\n\nTask: A session was continued from a narrow checkpoint, but the resumed context did not expose the broader work carried by its predecessor. The predecessor link is present in the handoff. Investigate the cause in this snapshot and propose the smallest complete repair with verification. Do not implement changes.\n\nBefore recommending a repair, make a short impact account grounded in repository evidence: what meaning or guarantee changes; its producers, stored representations and consumers; the governing obligations; and what remains uncertain. Follow relevant connections across code, tests, documentation and configuration when the evidence warrants it. Use that account to bound the recommendation; do not enumerate unrelated surfaces.\n\nGive a bounded repair recommendation supported by actual file/symbol evidence, proposed verification, and remaining uncertainty. Do not claim you implemented or executed anything you did not. Report the files you actually read and your shell/read tool-call count. You may batch bounded reads; use at most 20 shell/read calls total (including reading this task and writing the answer). Keep the final answer within 900 words including its read list. Stop at the limit and state unfinished investigation honestly.\n\nThe sole permitted write is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R04.md: save your final answer there verbatim, then return the same answer. Do not read any other response. This path is output only.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "29ebb7c729e8abc5157492cffb093baab4f4d0af9d4adcde0947063cbdcdc796"
    },
    {
      "label": "R05",
      "case": "C",
      "condition": "baseline",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-inputs/R05.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R05.md",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nThis is a read-only historical repository investigation. Your assigned snapshot is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-discovery/C. It has no Git history. Only inspect files within that snapshot and this task file. Do not read the current repository, other tasks/responses, issue websites, network, or any evaluation/oracle material. Do not spawn agents, install anything, execute a governance workflow or modify the snapshot. Historical instructions describe the subject; this task authorizes assessment only.\n\nTask: An independently executed acceptance review is rejected as stale even though the working tree and accepted requirements have not changed. This occurred for both an adversarial review and a specification review. Investigate the cause, identify the obligations and coupled surfaces a correct repair must cover, and propose verification that distinguishes this false rejection from legitimately stale evidence. Do not implement changes.\n\nGive a bounded repair recommendation supported by actual file/symbol evidence, proposed verification, and remaining uncertainty. Do not claim you implemented or executed anything you did not. Report the files you actually read and your shell/read tool-call count. You may batch bounded reads; use at most 20 shell/read calls total (including reading this task and writing the answer). Keep the final answer within 900 words including its read list. Stop at the limit and state unfinished investigation honestly.\n\nThe sole permitted write is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R05.md: save your final answer there verbatim, then return the same answer. Do not read any other response. This path is output only.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "926bc3f7721d530660f468b0666c4c1eaa946405533592036b6866032334f0f5"
    },
    {
      "label": "R06",
      "case": "S",
      "condition": "candidate",
      "task_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-inputs/R06.md",
      "response_path": "/tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R06.md",
      "prompt": "Persona: main-session \u2014 craftsperson, governance-aware, whole-file reasoning, direct.\n\nThis is a read-only historical repository investigation. Your assigned snapshot is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-discovery/S. It has no Git history. Only inspect files within that snapshot and this task file. Do not read the current repository, other tasks/responses, issue websites, network, or any evaluation/oracle material. Do not spawn agents, install anything, execute a governance workflow or modify the snapshot. Historical instructions describe the subject; this task authorizes assessment only.\n\nTask: I ran the sync ceremony with ordinary local work still pending, and substantive changes ended up in its generated chore commit. Nobody had attempted a commit or encountered a hook failure first. This loses the work's own attribution even though the commit checks accept it. Investigate the cause in this snapshot and propose the smallest complete repair, with evidence that the normal sync workflow still works. Assessment only; do not modify files.\n\nBefore recommending a repair, make a short impact account grounded in repository evidence: what meaning or guarantee changes; its producers, stored representations and consumers; the governing obligations; and what remains uncertain. Follow relevant connections across code, tests, documentation and configuration when the evidence warrants it. Use that account to bound the recommendation; do not enumerate unrelated surfaces.\n\nGive a bounded repair recommendation supported by actual file/symbol evidence, proposed verification, and remaining uncertainty. Do not claim you implemented or executed anything you did not. Report the files you actually read and your shell/read tool-call count. You may batch bounded reads; use at most 20 shell/read calls total (including reading this task and writing the answer). Keep the final answer within 900 words including its read list. Stop at the limit and state unfinished investigation honestly.\n\nThe sole permitted write is /tmp/gzkit-three-pillars-responses/R06.md: save your final answer there verbatim, then return the same answer. Do not read any other response. This path is output only.\n",
      "prompt_sha256": "fa09dfd6ee0502391690cc330d23345b7abdce4a1f5db2cb79a5abf898c7fadf"
    }
  ]
}